![]() IN LUMINE FIDEI: 30 APRIL – THURSDAY IN THE THIRD.IN LUMINE FIDEI: 30 APRIL – SAINT CATHERINE OF SIE.30 April, Antonio, Cardinal Bacci: Meditations For.New Spiritual Reading Post Beginning Tomorrow.Amazing Convergence of 3 Hearts on May 1 – Our Spi.The 2020 Rosary Crusade Against Marxism.Baltimore Catechism #4 - Lesson 29 - ON THE COMMAN.The Seven Penitential Psalms in Time of Pandemic.Suffering and Joy in Bleak and Dangerous Times.How a Visit to Chartres Changed My Life.Pope Francis Calls for ‘Obedience’ to Italian ‘Pha.Pope Francis Postpones Peter’s Pence Collection Am.The Catechism of the Summa - Tertia Pars - XI.Camarone Day - The French Foreign Legion.When Priests Aren’t Allowed To Give Last Rites.Ratzinger in the book edited by Herbert Vorgrimler (HINT: deep reservations about its drafting, structure and anthropocentrism). BTW… one might read the commentary on Gaudium et spes by young Fr. It is possible to be confused by things in Council documents, debate them, make arguments and then have them clarified, over time, by subsequent authoritative declarations. Hence, in 2000 the CDF issued Dominus Iesus. For example, the “Dogmatic Constitution” Lumen gentium had a point about the possibility of salvation outside the church (there’s a dogma about that). ![]() We can by convinced one way or another by clarifications made by legitimate authority (e.g., CDF) or by the force of the arguments. It is legitimate to debate about the debatable things. Libs say that everything in the mud is dogmatic according to their own interpretations. Some things are crystal clear and others are as clear as mud. That doesn’t mean that everything in every document is beyond criticism. Paul VI took the documents and he promulgated them. What they say about the Council is what the Council said about itself: it was intended to be pastoral Council (which is itself a historical departure) rather than a Council that would issue dogmatic statements. However, they acknowledge that Vatican II was, in fact, the 21st Ecumenical Council. The SSPXers are often said to be against or critical the Second Vatican Council. You can go to confession to them not just because there are no other priests around. So, SSPX priests can validly absolve sins even when there is no danger of death. Popes can do that sort of thing, whereas other entities such as dicasteries of the Holy See (e.g., the Pontifical Commission “ Ecclesia Dei” (PCED) of old and now CDF, and diocesan bishops) have to use another procedure. In this case, Francis said that people can be absolved by SSPX priests and that, as they say, is that. It’s better when they do things in a way that make things clear, with all the i’s dotted. However, Popes can do what they want in this regard. In this case there is no document that I’m aware of that explicitly grants faculties to the priests of the SSPX to hear confessions and to absolve. ![]() Those faculties are demonstrable with a document saying that Fr. This is a little odd, because it was not really a formal grant of faculties in the usual and expected way to the priests of the SSPX, as when a bishop grants faculties to a priest to receive sacramental confessions. That provision was extended beyond the “Year of Mercy” in the 2016 Apostolic Letter Misericordia et misera. On 8 December 2015, Francis told the Catholic faithful that for the Holy Year of Mercy they could go to priests of the SSPX for the Sacrament of Penance and that they could be validly absolved.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |